RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Oil bundlesThis isn't good for mmpr at all. Quit misleading. You have an additional 30,000 licenses competing. And if you think otherwise you neive as hell!
MagicBeans wrote: mmm MJ. My mom is 75 and we talk about MJ as a medicine. Even for myself. She understands and I have to say I was surprised when I first brought it up. She is church lady if you know what I mean LOL.
The board has a lot of alias and new names too, keep that in mind when understanding the anger. There is some fear from the Allard ruling as should be expected and its a good debate to have. Its not always about staying long and strong. Sometimes its best to jump off the train until your surer of the destination.
For myself, I have been studying the Allard case for a very long time and the implications to share prices and LP powers. I had no fear of the result nor was I surprised by it. In fact, I was encouraged by the urgency of the 6 month court mandated changes. Those will help the legalization initiitive to get done sooner and be inclusive of dispensaries, compassionate growers of medicines, cheap and tested products through LPs and finally the LP solution for large scale recreational and regulated MJ.
-
It was a win for everyone. I am only a buyer of the fear when needed because I understand the implications of the ruling and all the positive news about pharmacists becoming part of the distribution discussion. We are talking with Kirk Tousaw on Twtiter regarding the pharmacy solutions. He remains anti business but for me his words come more from a wish to have MMAR and dispensaries inlcuded. I think they will be.