RE:RE:RE:STOCKCOACHYet another aricle on VRX divergence that recklessley opines. Stockcoach, you say that the 14% outperformance number quoted is "assumed correct?" LOL, that's magic. Speaking to this chasm, CXR outperformed my gold stock to Friday by +358% !!!! I think its time we all employ the "fingers crossed" strategy.
Stockcoach1 wrote: sunshine7 wrote: in the charts it shows CXR out performing VRX since last Sept. Of course one can cherry pick the start dates to show anything. Author incorrectly says 'in the past few days'.
fdfd12 wrote:
thanks for the article. I don't see where it has done 14% as it states.
Below is a copy and paste of it.
After being tied together for weeks, Concordia has moved higher and outperformed Valeant by 14% in the past few days.
Sunshine you are correct to say that one can cherry pick the dates. However the author is not going back to September in her comparison.
If I pick February 18th as the divergent date then CXR has outperformed VRX by about 12%.
If I pick February 11th as the divergent date then CXR has outperformed VRX by about 20%
Not sure what date the author is using however her 14% can be assumed as correct. There is no doubt that CXR has taken a life of its own and noticeably diverged from VRX, and the author is correctly pointing that out.
I imagine this will be even more exacerbated for VRX when the two companies post their Q results. This is where I believe you will see a huge divergence.