RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Don't get burned by this guys!I think you're confusing me with someone else.
I rarely post on SH.
Either way, I notice you backed off your trash talk when I asked you to show your short position....Can't put your money where your mouth is huh?
watchmeplz wrote: I'm not here trying to prove how big my balls are. You go on pumping this thing around a circle with your other friends and in a month or two once your going to wake up and say, damn that guy made sense. i wish I would have listened.
guy369 wrote: yep yep - keep telling people they're wrong and you know what's best.
Seen my public portfolio? I'm not concerned with what other people think
Like when people told me AIG was going under...Right.
Again, show your short position - put your money where your mouth is...or it's just more bashing for the sake of bashing.
watchmeplz wrote: And Kia competes with Lexus and the handful of other car makers out there. Not 30,000 car makers. And those 30,000 aren't small operations either, some rivalling the size of tweed in its current state. This isn't stuff you need an expert to tell you and if you do, you might as well stop investing altogether and pick up a book on the basic fundamentals of how a company operates. It's not up to the government on this situation, back in 2001 when the MMAR case got ruled upon, it wasn't because the Feds wanted to make it possible for people to get marijuana, it was because they were forced to by a judge. Same situation here rolling forward, doesn't matter about the Feds it's what the judge did and he allowed some serious competitors to the field, which equates to ample amounts of burned capital/high overhead moving forward (3m a quarter + snoop + acquisitions) and little streams of revenue(3.5 mil a quart).
guy369 wrote: Compete with me?
Does Kia compete with Lexus?
So your response to a fact, given by experts are questions to me?
Take your questions to the experts and report back here.
Since when is SH full of experts? ...It's not - just like you.
You're no expert.
You do realize CGC is the kingpin of pot in Canada, right?
You should check out the new Toronto Life magazine, good write up on CGC in there.
watchmeplz wrote: Do you realize what multiple on revenue your trading at? I do. Do you realize your competition? Do you realize how close to your break even you are (along ways away) and that a judge just allowed 30,000 more licenses compete with you?
guy369 wrote: You know better than the experts right?
Quantitative Fair Value3.55
CAD
Hahaha, extremely over valued...Stop bashing things beyond your comprehension. watchmeplz wrote: Don't get caught with you pants down! This thing is extremely over valued
Interpolation1 wrote: like they say ... SELL when everyone is buying and for the first time in a decade all I hear are colleagues etc all LOOKING at buying in .... that tells me a SELL signal is a few months out all things being equal .... OR at LEAST sell some and cosolidat the rest ...