RE:RE:RE:If Im not mistaken...Fair enough comment, to each their own, good luck.
guy369 wrote: I dont' care...Because I don't feel as if I need to measure my balls compared to other people.
Good you are short, you walk your talk - I'm use to bashers who just bash for the sake of bashing on SH.
We're in a speculative stock with CGC, it's not a real investment - I haven't put in more than I'm willing to lose.
The potential upwards trumps the downward potential
watchmeplz wrote: Your absolutely right, if you look back at the ruling in 2001 and the reason for why the judge ruled the way he did it is because the mmpr is unconstitutional, that being said, if some sort of homegrow is allowed going forward it will dramatically hamper the mmpr's ability to break even escipically with the overhead of the mmpr facilities, there is a lot of additional costs assiociated with the mmpr that the homegrows don't face. Keep in mind if the company is burning through 3 million a quarter, with 3.5 million revenue, not only are they aways away from break even, they have already 2 quarters more booked for another 6 mil+ loss as per similar quarters would indicate.
Guy, you seem to go silent when I'm talking about the size of balls, I'm short 9500@2.90, who cares.
Goforbroke123 wrote: The judge didnt give 30,000 growers or competion a green light.<br /> The judge gave the govt 6 months to come up with a better plan.<br /> <br /> Considering the current plan was set in place by a govt who was against legalizing and regulating it probably makes sense to revamp the entire system.
Comapring the payoff when looking at other sin stocks I think its worth waiting to see where we land in the next 12-18 months.