RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The recent deals
Hopefully all of your picks will skyrocket soon, Cochise, but I'm surprised at the vitriol you hurl at Mr. Cremonese. You certainly harbour some kind of deep resentment toward this man. Extremely deep resentment, Cochise. For what? His "bad" decisions? His mocking of another company's share price, which, coincidentally turned out to be an accurate assessment. Even the insiders were selling, eh? Well, don't you think Mr. Cremonese felt he had good reason to withhold the title, Cochise, the act that underpins where we are today? Would you have exposed your company to coming up with 49% of all exploration costs, given your impressions of how the operator-to-be had spent its own exploration money in the past? Were critical and supporting documents quickly made available when requested, Cochise? And remember always, Cochise, if the right expert witness ever got to testify in front of Judge Grauer, perhaps today Teuton would be holding 100% of Treaty Creek; with costs, perhaps Electrum as well. We'll never know, but it doesn't matter. You'd still hate the man no matter what. You need a scapegoat and Dino is your scapegoat.
Look at it a different way. Ask yourself why Teuton issued two press releases indicating American Creek had earned its 51% interest. Why would Teuton do this, if it had no intention of handing over title? To me it sounds like Teuton expected to resolve whatever issues were in play at the time, believing that resolving them should have been an easy matter. Did anyone ask how much money still remained to be spent or how it should be spent? American Creek had been announcing it wanted the extra nine percent. which means any expenditure Teuton felt was necessary ultimately would be an integral part of what would end up in the feasibility study. It was money that was going to be spent anyway.
Yes, Cochise, I have the impression that resolving this dispute could have been quite simple and inexpensive, but you refuse to see things from any perspective other than the one that has Dino being a thief, a con artist, and you're 100% sure that all the other joint venture partners with whom Dino ever dealt also had been conned into giving up their projects. Ah, but Dino finally met his match when the good guys at American Creek fought back and refused to follow suit. Goodness ended up triumphing over evil. That's your perspective, Cochise. Well, put up your facts. Which of Dino's past partners ever were conned into giving up their prospects? Be specific. Well, you can't name one. Sure, you can name many partners that dropped their prospects, but none of them dropped their prospects because they were conned into doing so. Yet, you state this as fact. Well, let's hear your evidence.
Enjoy your investments, Cochise. Teuton does have a miniscule share structure and it does appear that the Company will have sustaining cash flow for the next several years. Forty million shares is a miniscule share structure, Cochise, especially when you own 49% of Treaty Creek. That's the way it is today, Cochise. Good properties, hot mining area, rising gold prices. Your other investments should do well, but Teuton won't, eh? Yes, I believe you when you say you just happened to be strolling by the Teuton bullboard and you thought you'd warn me about the greedy, evil, and incompetent Dino Cremonese. Maybe I'll sell all my shares tomorrow and I'll place whatever a receive on all of your picks. Yes, maybe I'll do that. Thank you for your service.