Confusing results-and wordingThe first results reported on only .89 tons showed 96 stones at or above .85mm-these latest results reporting over 1.25 tons which should include stones from foirst .89 tons only report less than 30 stones total at or above .85mm--how can a larger tonnage of same sample show small .85mm results than first partially sample---see my problem or are they saying this last result only added another 30 stones to original 96 reported--Can anyone clarify,since wording of report is confusing--either way last report not showing mant commercial stones---also appears total carat grade from first .89tons has shrunk fron 5.6carats to .66carats per ton on this last report--looks like more results on sample seem to indicate greatly decreasing grades of commercial sized diamonds and carat grade???