Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

Alternate Symbol(s):  MEGEF

MEG Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. The Company is engaged in the development of enhanced oil recovery projects that utilize steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods to improve the economic recovery of oil. It transports and sells thermal oil (AWB) to customers throughout North America and internationally. The Company owns a 100% interest in over 410 square miles of mineral leases in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada and is primarily engaged in sustainable in situ thermal oil production at its Christina Lake Project. Christina Lake Project is a multi-phased project, located 150 kilometers south of Fort McMurray in northeast Alberta. It comprised of approximately 200 square kilometers of leases.


TSX:MEG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by shambano1on Mar 22, 2016 10:20am
182 Views
Post# 24687447

likelihood of a takeover of MEG

likelihood of a takeover of MEGlets put some probability numbers on this event occuring;

PROS

1-good long term assets with approved expandions to over 200,000 bpd
2-low annual capex for next few years to maintain production at 83,000 bpd
3-very low operating costs 
4-good management team
5-a little more room to lower costs further in admin and head office 
6-selling access pipeline to lower debt 

CONS

1-highly leveraged
2-need plus 40 ,wti to break even due to high transporation costs and light oil purchases
3-high interest costs 
4-no room to increase produciton as prices rise 
5-selling access pipeline to lower debt will increase operating costs

I'm at 50/50 right now, I was higher but I have lowered it since the IMO announcement unless that is a ploy to keep MEG prices lower and the debt service costs would need to be taken over as well and maybe that would hinder buyers????

sure in a 50-60 WTI market the debt looks OK but by them MEG will be trading to 10-12 range and the low ball offers will not work any longer.

GLTA
Bullboard Posts