Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s): FCUUF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.

TSX:FCU - Post by User

Fission Uranium Corp

Bullboard Posts

Comment by sudzie191on Mar 22, 2016 12:53pm

107 Views

Post# 24688467

RE:RE:RE:RE:Did NXE dump SRK

Well I certainloy didn't mean that the software was faulty. Rather more alarming for all is that the methodology of using the whatever software, inputting to that software, following 43-101 rules, supervision, peer review, approval, and also supervision and review by Rubicon.

Just because someone uses a consultant, doesn't mean they will do everything correct, as I found out many times with many engineering projects.

If you are Rubicon management, you make dam sure whether its SRK, RPA, or whomever that they are doing work correctly.

shadeson wrote:
I was not contradicting myself. When I refered to modeling software I was responding to Sudzies question that sounded like he doubted the SRK computer models. My point was that if the same modeling inputs (factual and interpreted) are used in multiple software or by different consultants the outcome should be more or less the same, so software shouldn't be to blame if it was used correctly.

Conservative interpretation could have prevented the Rubicon fiasco. The interpretation part of resource modeling is the most subjective and therefore often controversial especially when based on limited drillhole information.

Bullboard Posts

Invest wiser with BMO's InvestorLine Platform features