RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:good to greatYou have so many aliases to spread your bull*hit that , that's it's hard to keep up who I have put on ignore... By the way you said that they signed a deal for the jet in early 2015 when the stock was at $62 and now it's $35.... My point was that when they deigned the jet deal and the stock was at $62 it then almost doubled before the share price collapsed for other reasons( including Hillary, Valeant and debt due to the transformative purchase of AMCo )so nothing to do with the jet deal as you imply.
ealth123]PJ, I never said the price decrease had anything to do with the jet contract. In fact if you read my posts I have suggested a few other things that may explain the recent drop but it seems to have fallen on deaf ears. What I said was that I don't believe that a CEO that has a private jet should be described as someone who isn't flamboyant as one poster described him to be. I think the opposite, my opinion of course!
By the way, you have said now three times that you have putt me on ignore so can you please insure that you get that green message from Stockhouse after you press the button that says user has been put on ignore just to make sure that you are doing that properly. Thanks much! Oh, and I'll put you on ignore so we can both do it at the same time, okay? 1 -2 -3 --------
Pj1958 wrote: Health321.... You failed to mention that the stock went up to $117 after the jet contract was signed... The recent drop to $35 had nothing to do with the jet contract
[/quote]