Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Geologix Explorations Inc GIXEF



GREY:GIXEF - Post by User

Comment by hammer161on Apr 15, 2016 11:08am
189 Views
Post# 24771090

RE:look at those assumptions again

RE:look at those assumptions again
Well done!! You have plucked out one end of their sensitivity scale - the one that at the time used 3 year rolling average metal prices. The pre-feasibility actualy used 4 year rolling averages of $1390 for Au and $3.44 for Cu for an IRR of 28%. While still high by todays prices they were valid then. Lots of studies from the tome would have used similar metal prices - not that thehy would now. Still a good project.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>