RE:RatsI've been watching this stock for a bit and was compelled to register to ask a question. Can someone explain to me how it is in the shareholder's interest to give up - what 3.3% of what is purported to be a multiB deposit so as not to draw down a million or so of a pre-approved line of credit to pay some bills. WITH that same LOC provided by the same company that has just increased its share of the deposit. Of course there also is the question of what all the expenses have paid for because they appear to not be releasing material information, that being the results of the drilling. This does not pass the smell test in my opinion. Your Senator certainly has your back in this, only problem is that it appears he is the one inserting the knife. This phaff character is worse it appears. Or maybe someone can explain to me the benefit of the apparent conflict of interest at play here. Regardless how lawyered up they are, I don't think a "control person" can do this under scrutiny.