Sudbury forum: Leap Manifesto the futurehttps://www.thesudburystar.com/2016/04/29/leap-manifesto-the-futureoneplan
A button supporting the Leap Manifesto. POSTMEDIA NETWORK
Steve May, Guest columnist
Rarely I have a read an editorial as disconnected from reality as the Point of View piece, "Leap Manifesto a threat to Sudbury, NDP," published April 13, 2016.
The Leap Manifesto poses no risk to the mining industry, which helped build our local economy, and which will help transform Northern Ontario's Ring of Fire into a 21st century mineral extractive enterprise.
Leap offers a way forward for the Ring of Fire, where development has come to a grinding halt under Liberal and Conservative governments at the provincial and federal levels.
The Star's editor contends that Leap's goal is to shut down mining. Nothing could be further from the truth. The editor quotes directly from the Manifesto to bolster his case, but the quotes are selective. Missing is the piece of the Manifesto that refers to how mining and resource extraction must take place in a low-carbon future: by first obtaining a social license from people who make their homes in the areas impacted by the enterprise.
One of the reasons that so little headway has been made with the Ring of Fire, and with other resource extractive projects elsewhere in the nation, has been due to local opposition to disconnected governments and multinational corporations that continue to believe that they can largely ignore the people who live in the areas impacted by their operations.
This approach may have worked in the past - especially where marginalized people have been unable to pursue justice for themselves and their families. Indigenous peoples in particular have for too long been shut out of a decision-making process that directly effects their well-being.
The Leap Manifesto acknowledges the new reality and seeks to establish a framework for socially and environmentally responsible resource projects that will create the jobs that fuel our collective prosperity.
Rather than a threat, Leap is a recipe for success - one which will work much better for governments than the current approach, often blocked by our courts, which largely continues to ignore the rights and needs of communities impacted by resource activities.
The Green Party of Canada has supported the Leap Manifesto since it was unveiled by prominent Canadians during the last federal election campaign. Our own policy framework, Vision Green, has long embodied many of the sensible principles put forward by Leap.
Greens from Northern Ontario, including Laurentian University economics professor David Robinson, were involved in the creation of policy to guide development in the Ring of Fire, based on the need for a social license.
Although I've long been a member of the Green Party, I was thrilled to hear that grassroots New Democrats adopted a resolution at their convention in Edmonton to begin discussing the use of Leap as a framework for future policy development.
I've long believed that a progressive NDP that bases its policies on social and climate justice would be a benefit to Canada.
Since all of our families will be impacted by changes to our economy and climate brought about by global warming, making the switch to a low-carbon economy based on the use of evidence and inclusive public policy is something that can - and must - transcend partisan politics.
The Leap Manifesto embodies an approach that all of those concerned about the future of our families, prosperity and planet can claim as common ground.
Steve May is an executive member of the Nickel Belt Greens
. . . .
The Leap Manifesto
Here's what the Leap manifesto calls for:
Shift swiftly away from fossil fuels so that Canada gets 100 per cent of its electricity from renewable resources within 20 years and is entirely weaned off fossil fuels by 2050.
No new infrastructure projects aimed at increasing extraction of non-renewable resources, including pipelines.
"Energy democracy," in which energy sources are collectively controlled by communities instead of "profit-gouging" private companies.
An end to all trade deals "that interfere with our attempts to rebuild local economies, regulate corporations and stop damaging extractive projects."
Expand low-carbon sectors of the economy, such as caregiving, teaching, social work, the arts and public-interest media.
Vigorous debate on the idea of introducing a universal guaranteed minimum income.
Declare that "austerity -- which has systematically attacked low-carbon sectors like education and health care while starving public transit and forcing reckless energy privatizations -- is a fossilized form of thinking that has become a threat to life on earth."
Pay for it all by ending fossil fuel subsidies, imposing financial transaction taxes, increasing resource royalties, hiking taxes on corporations and the wealthy, introducing a progressive carbon tax, and cutting military spending.