Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

Alternate Symbol(s):  MEGEF

MEG Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. The Company is engaged in the development of enhanced oil recovery projects that utilize steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods to improve the economic recovery of oil. It transports and sells thermal oil (AWB) to customers throughout North America and internationally. The Company owns a 100% interest in over 410 square miles of mineral leases in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada and is primarily engaged in sustainable in situ thermal oil production at its Christina Lake Project. Christina Lake Project is a multi-phased project, located 150 kilometers south of Fort McMurray in northeast Alberta. It comprised of approximately 200 square kilometers of leases.


TSX:MEG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by shambano1on May 26, 2016 11:51am
92 Views
Post# 24906814

RE:MEG uncertainty - real of imagined

RE:MEG uncertainty - real of imagined1-MEG has been under some selling pressure of late even as oil prices have been climbing, why?

I think the main reason why MEG is not responding to higher oil prices is mostly due to their higher leverage and as the markets witness more and more USA based shale companies going into protection then they associate MEG's higher leverage with bankruptcy protection situations occuring almost daily down south.

well, yes MEG's higher leverage is a concern but they are in no way to be compared with USA oil shale companies who need to spend big capital drilling more wells just to keep produciton flat.

MEG has reduce maintenance capital in 2016 to under 150 million if memeory serves me and that capex will maintain current produciton levels of 82,000- 83,000 bpd for all of 2016.

MEG has estimated that based on current strip pricing and this was 1 month ago, that will not need to dip into their lines of credit to fund capex in 2016.

additionally, with the sale of MEG's 50% interest in Access pipeline for an estimated 1.5 billion, thei will reduce the leverage and strengthen their balancve sheet.

so bottom-line, don't compare MEG to bankrupt shale oil companeis in USA that need a constantly borrow money to spend on drilling to keep production flat.

they are different animals, and any uncertainty about sustainability should be discarded.

GLTA

Bullboard Posts