Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."


GREY:LSTMF - Post by User

Comment by PROtradingon Jun 03, 2016 8:35am
116 Views
Post# 24930490

RE:Recourse for JR debt

RE:Recourse for JR debtExplore all options.  Not something I would investigate myself but I encourage you to explore these options and post your findings and what that would do to LTS at sub 20 cents.

I can't see much downsides from here and if there is, it won't be for long...

That's the indication we are getting from the bullboard "tools" and the TA charts.  They've beaten this down to the lows.  Impressive.

boarderex86 wrote: Anyone contacted IR to see if they can share what recourse is available to the junior debt holders upon default?  It dawned on me that the LOC cut could be part of a deal to exploit the jr debt.  

This is very "conspiracy theory" for me but, hypothetically, if a banker knew that a deal would be reached to resolve the LOC issue (which is secured debt), they would probably be tempted to buy the junior debt while the market is in limbo.  If a favorable renegotiation of the credit facility or asset sale were coming, the debt would be bound to recover quickly once news of new financing were released.

Perhaps the anticipated timeline of reaching agreement after the June 15th debt payment but before June 30th is not entirely related to timing of negotiations.  Could it be timed to drive the debt price down before announcing a transaction?  I would imagine certainty on a quick trade like this might influence the terms of a negotiation..

There was a comment made on three cc about the banks not wanting the company to use the LOc to pay the interest on the junior debt... Buying the debt would solve that issue too.

Of course none of this would make sense if a default on the junior debt will give debt holders some  sort of recourse or ability to intervene in asset sales or new equity raises.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>