RE:RE:RE:RE:Jason Mann past picks are his idea of "investable"Roller007 wrote: Twiker: no you are wrong. He specifically said I shorted it at $12. If you are going to debate my point then please get your facts strAight. And I don't give a hoot about his logic as its the same logic that led to his past pick performance.
Your comment should be directed to @miscstuff.
But now that you have involved me ...
Mann got the basic direction of the call ("short") correct, and was only wrong on the timing (and magnitude) of the bottom (everyone got that wrong -- I follow Teck very closely). Faulting someone for that is specious; only gawd calls bottoms, and only because gawd has insider knowledge.
Back to your logic ... I predict the sky will be pink with lime-green stripes on Sunday, and Monday, and Tuesday. Wednesday, you say I have a bad track record with calling the sky colour. Then I call for a blue sky Thursday, and you reject my call because of my track record. This is the logical flaw with what you wrote about Mann. Analyze the idea, not the track record.
Here ends today's supplemental note on logic.