Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

iShares Global Materials ETF V.MXI


Primary Symbol: MXI

The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of global equities in the materials sector. The fund seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Global 1200 Materials Index (the Underlying Index), which measures the performance of companies that S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI), a subsidiary of S&P Global, Inc., deems to be part of the materials sector of the economy and that SPDJI believes are important to global markets. It is a subset of the S&P Global 1200.


ARCA:MXI - Post by User

Post by wreakhavokon Jun 05, 2016 1:40pm
98 Views
Post# 24935623

Demand

DemandSoon it won't matter.  Demand for physical gold is beginning to skyrocket. I was reading in my Jim Rickards Strategic Intelligence report that every ounce of gold held at the Comex is owned by over 500 hundred different individuals.  If everyone demanded delivery at once, only a handful would ever own the gold.  Mining companies that actually hold physical gold could become very valuable.
Goldman Sachs and all the big crooked banks that want to supress the price of gold with their paper trading schemes will be hitting the proverbial fan pretty soon.

Curious that IMG lets MXI continue to fund 50% of the joint venture. .....instead of buying MXI outright.  t could be that IMG insiders participated in the private placement.  The only reason i can think of is that IMG feels their stock price is too low and would therefore have to give up too much. How do you see it? (trying to figure out the font change)
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>