RE:RE:RE:RE:WSJ saidHe sounds bitter. What happened to all his gloating over the weekend about The Times story? I do want to add one thing here. When I said remove your stop losses I want to clarify if it is not obvious that I am talking to longs here that plan to hold regardless of buyout. If you are a day trader, or piling in on BO rumors....then by all means do your thing, as if you regularly roll the dice on volatile stocks and BO rumors then you will get burned from time to time. If you have a longer time horizon and use stop losses to protect from crazy events, not normal volatility, it is a warning that the volatility on a given day may be larger than normal due to manipulation. It is a warning to longs that there are sharks out there and they might be desperate. Also, just a piece of advice, if the extent of your risk management is a stop loss then you have bigger issues IMO. I am going to take a break from here for a bit. Busy week at work, but will be watching and reading. Will post the daily short volumes for the past few on my lunch break. GLTA longs. Marcel
fdfd12 wrote: Actually speaking of chicken farmers, he just tweeted.
@AlderLaneeggs
terminator007 wrote: DrugPusher wrote: And equally amazing that you think this is a stock behaving this morning as if it there is still hope for a deal with Apollo. They would have been better off to frame the news as if more firms were interested. But until Apollo disputes it wsj can keep that alive.
Without that bogus news this would be in the 20's now
Drug--you sound like chicken farmer's chicken LMAO