RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Somebody put this thing out of its miseryBurconNutriFan wrote:
blah, blah blah are boring.
There are worse things than being boring. I am sorry I bore you.
can't find the ENTER key wrote: ''''''''''''''''
BurconNutriFan wrote:
The 3 points I made yesterday are valid yet you choose to switch subjects.
Sorry, I must have missed your 3 self-validated points in the midst of all the personal attacks. Try again without the ad hominem vitriol and I will willingly engage.
can't find the ENTER key wrote: '''''''''
BurconNutriFan wrote:
It is obvious you can never admit your falsehood errors when you today post that you just have a difference of opinion with lfsca
What can I say? I proposed one reason and someone else proposed another. No one was proven wrong. If you have proof one way or another, please share.
BurconNutriFan wrote: when the reality is you had posted another useless and boring conspiracy theory lie as an excuse for another GA hate attack.
No GA hate attacks here just a disagreement with who is getting rewarded here.
I supported the company by buying shares of discontented initial investors. I chose to hold my shares despite a crashing SP to support the company. The new capital was raised on the back of existing investors.
New capital investors took a risk that they would be able to pad their accounts with warrant-derived shares accumulated at a discount. It did not pan out: too bad, so sad. That is the risk one takes.