Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by teeveeon Jun 14, 2016 9:50am
113 Views
Post# 24963241

the real problems with FCU....

the real problems with FCU....Quakes,
THE elephant in the 43-101 PEA on PLS is the   $20 million geotechnical program  recommended to see if the dyke is even feasible. FCU has not announced a budget or program to address the recommendations in the PEA. Why would that be? Is PLS economically mineable? Who knows as the technical data to make that determination has not been gathered. Another problem that needs to be addressed is fracture porosity and permeability in the first 5o meters of bedrock under PLS. We know from other undergorund mines that at least a 50 meter crown pillar is required when mining under a lake to mitigate water ingress. What about water ingress from fractured bedrock into a 2 kilometer long open pit wall at PLS? Those hydrogeological studies have not been done. It could be PLS is not mineable at any uranium price. Good luck with your fantasy PLS mine as you and the rest of the bagholders are going to need it.  

Bullboard Posts