RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Paid Basher LatticeHow can a bet be friendly when money is involved?
In the old days, we used to say "a sportsmans bet" and only a
handshake was required without any money.
Now that is freindly.
Lattice wrote: puma, If I bother you, just put me on ignore. The presenter was definitely Edward Borkowski, and I don't care that Kreppner was listed on the agenda, Borkowski was the one who showed. If you want to put money on it, I am willing to put $10,000 on my word. We can use a lawyer's trust account to facilitate the friendly bet, and we can use attendees of the conference (talking heads Zechner, Tefsler and others) to confirm that Borkowski presented at the Scotia conference. I will donate my winnings to charity, how about you message me and tell me what lawyer you picked to and I will have the funds wired to the lawyer within 48 hours. Stop your insane posting, and looking forward to your direct message so I can faciliate our friendly bet. You can also pick the charity if you want. Cheers!
puma1 wrote: Lattice wrote: Joseph and Pj, Scrap the ENDP off my list - I didn't post anything on SH on this name, and it looks like on Perrigo I am just talking to myself ... but there seems to be some nastiness happening on ANY (Sphere 3D) to my posts. Nice bagholders there too.
there we go - more proof there are two posting under Lettuce - one that shoots off fast and doesn't think as much and the other that looks back at the script to see what was said so she doesn't look quite as stup!d.
to get back to the real point why i started today, Lettuce head had a thread on the presentation going for 3 pages or so. it was apparently based on her well places sources who attended the presentation
it sounded good enough to spin around 3 pages plus of doubt - the fact that Lettuce didn't even know the real presentor was just too much - nothing more needs to be said i think!