So what is the - percentage share ownership - per holder ? Yes... I agree Joe - the name that comes ot mind - that's seen buying shares - the name that sounds like the former - French sonic plane - sure is going to town buying a ton of shares - they haven't stopped buying.... wow -
Which begs one to ask - just what is the new percentage tally - of who owns how many shares - and how many big players are there ?
On the Corporate presentation page13 - fine print - It states - As a result of the acquisition - Integrity's founders own 11.3 percent of Poydras' outstanding common shares.
Then ask - who else has a large interest in common shares - count back to the acquisition when Poydras had share offerings - and aswell others who've took part in financing - then - how about prior to the Integrity acquisition and then during - then consider - the consolodation of prior companies or interest and their ownerships - as per topic of shares.
In fact - how many shares were outstanding prior to - the company changing into the gaming sector ?
On another note -
One poster commented that macy owned how many - hello - add those shares to the total tally - and it certainly begins to add up in the direction of larger interest -
So..... we now sit at 34.5 million (+/-) common shares.
Which reminds me - another poster made a comment on the debentures - please do forgive if i don't use exact words from that poster - but it read along the lines of - the company wanting to buy up the debentures? Is this correct ?
So - what picture is being painted ?
Apparently we're undervalued - and a larger interest is scooping up a ton of shares... and if 11.3 is owned by holders inside the company the former Integrity owners - then who else has a large interest ?
What i get is this... there doesn't seem to be hardly any common investors - but rather - moreso larger holders - my theory is based on the present trading going on - seeing what borkerages are trading more often - whose doing the majority of buying and then comparing this stock to other stocks that see a ton of common trades - as per common interest - smaller holders. This stock certainly doesnt act like other stocks....
What have we shareholders seen since last year till now ? A ton of annon action - and a name that's similar to the former French plane - lol
My wish ?
PYD - buys out the lil guys - smaller shareholders.... lol
Question is - exactly what is that percentage of smaller interest ?
How much is left >? would it be even feasable or practical for the company to do so ?
THROW THE DICE - QUESTION:
If a listed company has a form of partnership - an outside interest that has dealings with a listed company - and together - they both decide to do business - on 50% 50% percent basis -
Remeber - only one of the 50% is a listed company - so the question is - what is the normal practice of a listed company - do they - should they - show all revenues earned - both revenues from each interest in a - total sum - even though they're partnered or have a shared revenue interest ?
Or is it common practice for a listed company to only show 50% - just they're own revenues - just their own portion - and dismiss the other partner or interests revenues ?
Again - If a company is listed - doing busines with another - should they not be able show all revenues earned - a combined - and in the latter - when it comes time to do accounting - adjust it then?
Im no accountant - but when it comes to financed or leased revenues... and if a comapny is listed ... whats the normal proceedure - can they - should they - must they - list all revenues ?
Would it not be better if they did - meaning - showing just how much the slots make in a total sum? But the real question is - are we seeing it - or are we only seeing pyd's 50% adjusted figure ?
BUT, BUT, BUT... ?
But, what if the second interest is a private interest - not another company - but merely an investor - hence - leased revenues and finaced revenues ?
Personally - I would like to know just how much these slot machines do take in - in such an arrangement of finaced vs leased - and 50% split - menaing - if the revenues are doubled in the category of finaced slots - but pressed as - only showing pyd's portion of 50% - then why not 100% revenues showing - a press that states the total fianced slot revenues - and not just the 50% portion of pyd's - the listed companies revenue - at least not until the adjustment in accounting ?
Not sure if this is the case for pyd .... but if it is .... I think it would benefit the company all the more - if they showed the greater revenue sum (total combined) vs showing the lessor - a 50% revenue - just pyd's portion. ( adjust portions of revenues - in the accounting )
What i'm trying to say is this... Partner A + Partner B - decided to buy a house together - they paid 500k then resold it for 700k total = profted 200k total = each earned 100k total - - what is the correct term to use - when speaking of total sum and percentage portion ?
Should all figures be stated - and later - adjusted in th accounting for tax purposes ?
Should each partner boast and say they resold it for 700k = total sum market value - what it fetched what was made ?
What if only one is a listed company - should they announce all figures - then adjust the 50% ?
Should each speak a combined earning - 200k?
Should each speak only what they each earned - singualr - as in 100k?
What's most important - when it applies ot a listed company ?
Should stating a total sum be in order - though only 50% share interest - so long its adjusted in the latter ?
See what im trying to say - what's more benificial to a listed company ? Stating all or only 50% they're share - Again, maybe - maybe not - pyd is dong this... all because....
- Reference -
Page 14 of the Corporate prsentation page - fine print - using an adjusting of 50% for its share of earnings - why isnt the figure of 100% being used - since its a listed company - and adjusted only - come accounting time ? Shouldnt they boast what they've made in a total sum - with another - especially when listed ?
Note: I may not fully understand this sort of separating - financed from leased - or the 50% thingy when it comes to adjusted - but then again i may be onto something - indeed, it's quite confusing. Perhaps all the revenues are shown 100% - and later is adjusted in the accounting... Anyone care to iron this out - bring clarity to it ? I'm not trying to hinder but help company and shareholders - and the question is what are the rules ot this and what do other listed companies do - has anyone seen another company whose partnered and do they list total revenues then in the latter adjust it - or do they only press 50% as well |_ again - hopefully ive not misunderstood page 14 - 50% pyd share?
Any guesses ?
Wish i knew more about accounting .. and its practices... to tired to research this out tonight... im just trying to see if it would benefit a company moreso - showing total revenues - vs 50% just their portion - if this is the case - maybe its not...
Sorry - if i've been repetative.... lol
Too tired to proof read .... hopefully you get what i'm trying to say.... lol
Cheers !