RE:RE:Some datamisterbill15 wrote: Chemical and geophysical (resistivity) results were provided by the current concession owner. Alset has not verified all the data as most of the sample trenches are no longer open for duplicate sampling. However, the samples were analyzed and results reported by a certified laboratory. The results are considered relevant and suitable for disclosure because they reveal the presence of lithium in concentrations of potentially economic interest."
The unknown is the status of "certification". Obviously it's not 43-101 compliant, but there are Labs such as Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratories, Intertec, SGS Mineral Services with Mexican facilities which test in compliance to NA standards.
A good question for Alset...perhaps I'll give them a shout
According to the source I linked to in my previous post, (which I highly encourage everyone to read) the samples from Salada were "certified by the Inspectorate company of Richmond, British Columbia", and the samples from Caliguey were analyzed by "the laboratory Asesoria en Absorcion Atomica based in SLP". My concern would be less with the labs than with the handling of the samples before they were presented to the labs. I'm anxious to see fresh samples taken by our boys.