RE:RE:I was wrong....
By the way skier59, you should quit trying to make false comments and then attribute them to me. I don't say the science won't work only that I am skeptical and with good cause. Do a Google search on TLT if you dare and you'll see endless YouTube videos pop up featuring Roger giving investors a lecture of what the company's strategic goals will be in the coming months of when the video was shot. I say if you dare because it soon becomes glaringly obvious that Roger has not done a very good job of meeting his stated timelines for both the TLC division and the PDT. But that's another subject in itself. Point being, information on what TLT hopes to achieve have been out there in abundance for years. Experts in the scientific community, high profile money managers and senior executives of highly competitive big pharma companies all who are a lot smarter than me know about or should by now be familiar with TLT's pre-clinical research so why no talk of a stink bid takeover when the stock is dirt cheap or at the very least a strategic partnership? From what I can see there is no buzz surrounding the company unless you consider buzz as being the hope of a relatively speaking good payday of a few cents for day traders on the back of an ITA announcement? Will you be there to sell skier59? What a dumb question....eh?