WISR Ltd V.WZR

K rooks. All of them. IMO.

[Sheepshape]

https://ekurd.net/sons-kurdistan-ruling-elite-2016-07-26

Note the comments made by one of the protagonists below the main article:

"Whilst it is always a delight to see reporters exposing to the public the truth "the whole truth and nothing but the truth" and whilst this is a welcomed insightful article, it would be quite important to ensure that all facts are relayed to your readers as relied upon from the Court documents and associate transcripts and the further ruling of July 8, 2016. 

Be it intentionally or not, this author seems to shy away from completing some of his sentences such as "fell out over the WZL deal as well as their other joint..."? and you choose not to relay all the facts presented to and relied upon by the Judge! 

Other facts inclusive of but not limited to the following are abscent; 1. WZL lied under oath and were far from truthful, 2. WZL delibrately restricted its documentary evidance and failed to provide full disclosure that may have shed more light to Western Oil company's dealings with corrupt Kurdish Officials, 3. no submissions were made or was presented that allegidely 75% of the $700k was in fact paid to bafel "the War Lord" and 4. Dr Ashti was not "cleaning up" but to the contrary he was enforcing his own agenda, such as the request of 10% carried interests which he was requesting from WZL for "Local sub partner" in place of NearEast resources (Wathiq Hindo) and Calex (ahmed Saeed) as he already did with DNO outside the official Krg share. (See the invovlement of the US senator in the DNO case) and 5. who and where do the millions of Signiture bonuses actually go to? does Dr Ashti provide proof and accountability for all the hundred of millions of US$ paid to Political parties or thier offshoots as local contractors?

It would have been approriate to ask the parties involved, as other reporters have previously, for clarifcations of the facts and or comments prior to writing the article, unless possibly the article and or its author may have a sperate agenda to achieve, which to this reader, seems quite obvious to be more bias towards sheding a clear innocent light on Dr Ashti's and WZL's name and involvement which is far from the truth.

Best regards

Yassir Al-Fekaiki"