RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:CGC: Not just Canada, but a GLOBAL storyThat is what I wrote .... I said company wise back then the stock went up based on a plan or a business model whereas here we have real assets, real customers, real growth, etc. I said there are similarities though .... like when everyone is buying generally is the time to sell but that this industry and this company in particular is diffferent at least at this time. Glad you agreed with what I wrote .... :) Stupid Jays,
YodaLayhehoo wrote:
Tweed's assets amount in the 100 millions. Factory Greenhouse land ect. Zero resemblances to the .com era. They sell a commodity, that can by touched and understood. Their inventory has value. $4 shares price is not a sell, maybe if it shot up to 30 dollars we'd have a bubble. Canopys assets including inventory probably account for over 25% of the market cap. .com had a computer as collateral.