Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Montauk Metals Inc V.MTK

Alternate Symbol(s):  GAYGF

Montauk Metals Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is focused on seeking new exploration projects. Its subsidiaries include Galway Resources Vetas Holdco Ltd. (Cayman Islands), Galway Resources Vetas Holdco Ltd. and Sucursal Colombia and Galway Gold US Inc.


TSXV:MTK - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Bountyhunter11on Aug 10, 2016 1:25am
266 Views
Post# 25125170

RE:RE:RE:RE:CEO OF RED EAGLE MINING- TALKS COLOMBIA AND THESE ARE FACTS

RE:RE:RE:RE:CEO OF RED EAGLE MINING- TALKS COLOMBIA AND THESE ARE FACTS
Also of note, and one of the more significant observations of this interview in my opinion, is the reference to Graystar. The only reference being that Graystar (Not EOM) encountered problems because they wanted to build an open pit mine in a watershed. I'm sorry but that's old news. Why refer to that ancient BS, without even referencing the company's current name? Particularly when EOM has a significant story of its own struggles and is the current name of the company in question? I'm sorry but that is some serious effed up sh/@t!! My guess is EOM is a taboo subject. In order to maintain any credibility he would have to call out the Colombian government for their dysfunctional, shady treatment of EOM wouldn't he? But then, he can't exactly go around biting the hand that feeds him, can he? Particularly when you're this close to fulfilling your vision there. The interviewer may have tried to get him to bite on the topic but he only took a slight nibble... so as to not to completely avoid it, but strategically avoid speaking about EOM specifically. All the while singing praises about how easy of a ride it has been for his company, within all levels of government, and downplaying any and all of the hiccups the company experienced. He addressed eveything in the best possible way he could without looking like a complete tool, or putting his relationship with the Colombian government at risk. Praise the hand that feeds you and, when it comes to EOM, no comment.... Much to read between the lines here in my opinion. Thanks for sharing youngman. Enjoyed the listen... BH
Bullboard Posts