RE:Comparing Harpoon discovery hole with recent PLS drill holesOnly a sociopath would make such a post completely out of context. Quakes, you are one sick person......will R1620 be large enough to justify a 30% increase in the length and cost of the dyke, plus a 30% increase in construction time, and likely 40-50% increase in dyke costs?
quakes99 wrote: Here are some general comparisons between the Harpoon discovery hole and recently announced holes at PLS,that the bashers and trolls laughed at as being "lousy". Now they are the ones pumping the new discovery hole as fantastic... even though it fails to measure up to many of the new PLS holes on overall width of mineralization, width of high-grade, and most importantly Depth.
Harpoon Discovery Hole:
"Drill hole HP-16-08 intersected
17.0 m of continuous mineralization (
220.0 to 237.0 m) including
4.5 m of off-scale radioactivity (>10,000 to >61,000 cps)"
Summer 2016 holes at PLS released over the past 3 weeks:
PLS16-485 (line 1515E)
-
35.0m total composite mineralization over a 55.5m section (between 84.0 to 139.5m), including
-
7.1m of total composite >10,000 cps
- PLS16-500 (line 1545E)
- 43.0m total composite mineralization over a 60.5m interval (between 86.0m to 146.5m), including
- 8.48m of total composite >10,000 cps
- PLS16-498 (line 1515E)
- 31.0m total composite mineralization (between 73.0m to 104.0m), including
- 4.72m of total composite >10,000 cps
- PLS16-495 (line 855W)
- 66.0m total composite mineralization over a 80.0m interval (between 137.0m to 217.0m), including
- 3.00m of total composite >10,000 cps
- PLS16-489 (line 1455E)
- 14.5m total composite mineralization (between 68.0m to 82.5m), including
- 1.88m of total composite >10,000 cps
Is the grass really greener across the fence?
Good luck to the longs.