Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by teeveeon Aug 11, 2016 4:34pm
131 Views
Post# 25132807

RE:Comparing Harpoon discovery hole with recent PLS drill holes

RE:Comparing Harpoon discovery hole with recent PLS drill holesOnly a sociopath would make such a post completely out of context. Quakes, you are one sick person......will R1620 be large enough to justify a 30% increase in the length and cost of the dyke, plus a 30% increase in construction time, and likely 40-50% increase in dyke costs? 


quakes99 wrote: Here are some general comparisons between the Harpoon discovery hole and recently announced holes at PLS,that the bashers and trolls laughed at as being "lousy".  Now they are the ones pumping the new discovery hole as fantastic... even though it fails to measure up to many of the new PLS holes on overall width of mineralization, width of high-grade, and most importantly Depth.

Harpoon Discovery Hole:

"Drill hole HP-16-08 intersected 17.0 m of continuous mineralization (220.0 to 237.0 m) including 4.5 m of off-scale radioactivity (>10,000 to >61,000 cps)"


Summer 2016 holes at PLS released over the past 3 weeks:

PLS16-485 (line 1515E)
  • 35.0m total composite mineralization over a 55.5m section (between 84.0 to 139.5m), including
  • 7.1m of total composite >10,000 cps

     
  • PLS16-500 (line 1545E)
    • 43.0m total composite mineralization over a 60.5m interval (between 86.0m to 146.5m), including
    • 8.48m of total composite >10,000 cps

  • PLS16-498 (line 1515E)
    • 31.0m total composite mineralization (between 73.0m to 104.0m), including
    • 4.72m of total composite >10,000 cps

  • PLS16-495 (line 855W)
    • 66.0m total composite mineralization over a 80.0m interval (between 137.0m to 217.0m), including
    • 3.00m of total composite >10,000 cps

  • PLS16-489 (line 1455E)
    • 14.5m total composite mineralization (between 68.0m to 82.5m), including
    • 1.88m of total composite >10,000 cps

Is the grass really greener across the fence?

Good luck to the longs.


Bullboard Posts