RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FPF-1 valueKeith
Worth digging into this further I think. I did not fully understand the position and I am not quite sure I fully do now although your post has shed a lot more light on this.
Why would petrofac have agreed to do the additional work that it is often assumed they agreed to, perhaps after the initial flow tests they realised that there was enough throughput from Stella/Harrier to fill their boots. But is does surprise me that Petrofac don't seem to be tied into FPF-1 throughput from additional fields as well.
Your suggestion that analysts don't fully realise the apparent strength of the Ithaca's asset position with regard to FPF-1 may well be correct I suspect.
I will raise this with IC before the next reporting, they are usually quite good at digging into these things.
Doug