Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Orex Minerals Inc V.REX

Alternate Symbol(s):  ORMNF

Orex Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is focused on precious and base metals exploration in Mexico and Canada. The Company is engaged primarily in the acquisition and exploration and evaluation of assets. It has several projects, including two projects located in Durango State, Mexico, the Sandra Silver-Gold Project with Pan American Silver Corp. and the Coneto Gold-Silver Project with Fresnillo PLC. The third project is the Valenciana Gold-Silver-Base Metals Project in Zacatecas State, Mexico. The fourth project is the Jumping Josephine Gold Project in British Columbia, Canada. The Sandra Project is situated north of the town of Tepehuanes, Durango, in the heart of the Mexican Silver Trend, midway between the mining districts of Tovar and Guanacevi. The Coneto Silver-Gold Project is adjacent to the village of Coneto de Comonfort, centrally positioned within the Mexican Silver Trend, over 100 km north of the city of Durango, Mexico.


TSXV:REX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Public_Heelon Aug 13, 2016 11:23am
177 Views
Post# 25138791

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Much higher

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Much higher
"""In past cases where management was in favour of an arranged takeover, there was a voting requirement for a majority of shares not controlled by management to also be in favour of the arrangement.  I see no difference why this should not be the case where management comes down against a hostile bid.""

Imagine management owning, say, 50%. Would it make sense for a hostile takeover to
only need a majority of the other 50%?
Bullboard Posts