Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Old PSG Wind-Down Ltd PSGLQ

"Old PSG Wind-down Ltd designs, develops, manufactures and sells performance sports equipment and related apparel for ice hockey and roller hockey, baseball and softball, lacrosse and soccer. Its brands include BAUER, VAPOR, SUPREME, and NEXUS."


GREY:PSGLQ - Post by User

Post by taketheriskon Aug 16, 2016 10:23am
394 Views
Post# 25145654

Audit question mark

Audit question mark I am a CPA since 20 years, I assist at the audit committe a many public company. I do a small list of the question for PSG.

1) Bankrupt filling - for me doesn't work, the company have a good short term asset vs short term liabilites in Q-3. 


2) Debt Ratio - PSG have maybe debt ratio to meet, maybe the convenant are not meet at the year end. Also, the audit committe maybe look like if some element can reduce the interest rate, the convention look like than the % of interest are based on certain criteria, maybe some of them can be put outside of the calculation.

3) wrtie-off - impairment of goodwill and or trademark is under review.

4) onerous contract - the new shop model doesn't work anymore and PSG have to record a provion in the financial statement

5) going concern, the cash flow look like tight

based on my experience, I believe in the element 2, the point is the more complexe than all, you are a lot of discussion and bank take some time. This point look like not bankruptcy but renegociation of debt.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>