RE:RE:RE:Lung versus bladder?Why they chose to go after bladder cancer first is nothing more complicated then they picked a part of the body their treatment could tackle the easiest. We only were informed recently that the clinical trial would include the dosimetry fiber optic cage but they must have been planning its inclusion for a long time. They just didn't publicly say much until the patent was a certainty. To me it looks to be a totally unsuitable method for lung cancer since the lungs are not like a spacious balloon which more describes a bladder. The lung has too many places where the cancer cells can hide so assuming they even get that far, they willl more than likely need to apply a custom procedure just for lungs. Again, we are putting the cart before the horse since they haven't even been given permission to hold a clinical trial yet. The subject of what cancer they will go after next is a moot point anyway because if their bladder cancer treatment works as effectively as some posters here speculate to cure bladder cancer than there will be no testing on lung, brain or whatever since the company will be quickly bought out by a pharma multi-national.