Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Chalice Brands Ltd CHALF

Chalice Brands Ltd. is a U.S. operator in the most competitive, innovative and mature cannabis market in North America. Leaders in retail, marketing and craft cultivation supported by fully integrated processing and distribution. The Company has 12 retail stores in Oregon operating as Chalice Farms, Homegrown Oregon and Left Coast Connection and is distributed nationally through Fifth & Root.


GREY:CHALF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by jutah70on Sep 02, 2016 6:42pm
131 Views
Post# 25204651

Ambiguity

AmbiguitySo the inclusion/exclusion of BMF keeps rearing it's ugly debate.  Not that this post will solve the argument (although with the current evidence from news releases and financial reports we do have an idea of where we stand).  Yet the ambiguity still exists.

A couple of things kind of crossed my mind.  If BMF is not part of the overall picture, why do we see revenues or any financial information in quarterly releases (answer that for yourself or make yourself familiar).

Another point came to mind as well.  It was as a result of actually looking that the company's name - Golden Leaf Holdings.  It is the Holdings that got the thoughts working.  Holding corporations often time have several companies/brands under the umbrella of the holding corporation.  Yet each of the individual pieces may operate as separate entities.  Take a look at some examples (not that they are exact comparisons in structure, but you may get the point I am trying to make):
- Power Corp - owns Power Fin'l, Great West Life, IGM.

Maybe the longer term strategy sees GLH own whole or part of several companies.  If you look at the corporate presentation (Veridian from months ago) they certainly have the set up.  So BMF can likely stay as BMF, but still be part of the GLH family so to speak.  Hard to say how it plays out as the legal landscape is being shaped as we go.  But as we have seen, GLH is involved in that process in an intimate way.

This in fact leads to another of my 'looking out a few years'/big picture thinking ideas.  Would be interesting if they did acquire several companies/brands.  And as they grow them they have the option of "spinning" them off into their own entities/stocks.  Would be a pretty sweet thing to grant options/warrants to shareholders.

Maybe it is things like this as to why they decided to change the company structure.  Don't get tied up or bogged down with growing the plants.  Organize the company so they are managing the elements, brands, and subsidiaries.

Hope to try some of their product some day.  Maybe my mind won't be so busy for a few hours, lol.
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse