RE:RE:RE:RE:Also by that logicBashnomore wrote: "If the company thought they'd be in defualt they would not have broadened the scope of the project." How do you come to the conclusion that IMP would not signed the incremental work order because if they thought they would be at default in paying V1?
So the rational is that if the ceo knows the company is going to be going under and filing for BK it makes no sense to add on additional work to when the company will be struggling with paying their employees. Is this not blazingly obvious. Oh wait you're completely retarded
Lol seriously? This is your logic? You really believe that this is sound logic? Idiot, if a the company goes bankrupt the owed wages are #1 on the list of creditors. God you are a moron. Additionally in canada the wages are guaranteed by the government. You are so facking dumb, and the worst part you belive you are smart you fawking dumb piece of sh1t. You can't even come up with you own insults... you are the one that everyone calls the village idiots lol