RE:Good detective work, guys...!
For the record, scoundrels on this board are trying to leave investors with the impression that I am against improvements in the treatment of cancer. That clown bencro even posted that I was for chemo and against the " light." Let me just say how idiotic that statement is when chemo though a horrendously painful procedure to go through has saved countless lives including a close family member of mine whereas " the light " has yet to make it out of the experimental stage. As such it goes without saying the light is nowhere near being adopted in hospitals as a viable alternative to chemo therapy. Every one of us would like to believe there is something less stressful to offer a cancer patient on the horizon but when so few companies and eminent researchers have adopted PDT an investor needs to ask why? For once I'd like to see Roger take his slide show to a seminar of gathered world class scientists in the field of cancer for their appraisal. It could be easily arranged. Instead, he uses the company's financial resources to go from trade show to trade show trying to sell the cure for cancer to laypersons. Some people on this board like to occupy their time by dreaming of easy money to be made by investing here so in keeping with that theme imagine what an endorsement of TLT's treatment would do to the sp if it was given by a team of top scientists? So why doesn't Roger do it?