RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Regardless - the idiot
,,,,,,,speaking of revisionary history,,,,,, you certainly posted around the ad hoc analysis on the RVX board after the Assure trial failure,,,,,I dont recall anything positive in your posts,,,
Speaking of uninformed posters, it's "post hoc", not "ad hoc". At the time, I posted factual information about RVX's post hoc analysis when everyone on the board was treating those analyses like they were part of the original study. I explained post hoc analyses, along with the risks and limitations, and how they can be useful. You clearly still don't understand any of it.
And of course, there is no revisionist history there.