RE:I'm concerned about EQT and have been acting on it...jimrockford wrote: ...I can be inboxed if anybody wants a dialogue re this...The three ring circus the trolls have here isn't that interesting to me.
Jim
The fact of the matter is transparency requires a strong degree of accountability. And for Jimbo accountability is a toxic mindset. The private in-boxing escapade only serves to further the narrative that EQT probably has a huge clusterf**k on their hands and the unpleasant seriousness pointed out by some of us that really do care in the truth really chaps your azz.
These guys at EQT appear to have bitten off not one but two substandard lank packages and that is looking more and more like the kiss of death. It now appears to me that Alta Florista acquisition had some huge false forward looking assumptions and flaws all the way around. Why am I so radical about this cr*p is because I feel I was mislead and I now can see that these guys lack the strong dynamics to make a substandard property perform and the people that are going to take in the azz will be the small investor.
Honestly, if you can't talk about any positives in an open forum, then I would imagine you don't really believe any of the obscure hidden nonsense your pandering to the few remaining inbox hangers-on.
Near-term, turn key gold production is one of the most outrageous false narratives put forward and should be enough to put numerous management members in the unemployment line IMO.
But Jimbo, by all means go run and hide in the in-box. We all understand, you've lost the narrative.