RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mackie is still buying again today ...Just to clarify... when you indicate that it tested .26 on the last run and in the past indicated it was going to test .22, can you put that into context? What are your upper and lower SP limit when you say testing a SP? Is it hitting the SP, or within a 2 or 3 cent variance? Please do not infer any sort of challenge in this question... I am asking for clarity so that in the future should you make such predictions.... it will make sense to me and perhaps others.
Cheers and GLTA.
thepbay wrote: Just call it like I see it, that is all. Way easier to talk on the board then answer all the email. Guess I must know what I am talking about. What I discussed long ago about fundamentals and business cycles has been proven. Take the chart out of it. If you think I am the one walking it down, ha. This board means jack sh*t. If I do buy again, I will make sure to inform you, if it makes you feel better. After all, I said when I bought and when I sold earlier. What more do you want? Go find the pump crew, that were always talking to Mackie, that pushed the BS all over this board. Don't see them here anymore. Experience in markets is what is missing on this board. Way too many newbies in this stock, drinking the Kool-Aid. Everyone is now hanging their hat on a NR from this Paris show. Not going to happen, and is something you should never do if you're "investing". That is called gambling. If there is any kind of chatter around a NR, the chart will tell you, just like it did when it was testing .26 on the last run. Till then, WAIT!!!!! GL
pbay