RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mackie is still buying again today ...I didn't suggest you were hiding anything. I didn't suggest that you had an agenda. I'm not referring to you as a basher. There isn't anyone that I consider an enemy on here. While I do sometimes question peoples motives, I was not doing so with you when I posed the question nor was I implying any sort of deception on your part. I've said to you before I believe your posts could be of tremendous value with the exception of the churn they sometimes generate. That is not necessarily a reflection of you or your intentions, but in your communication style. Perhaps clarification could quell some of the responsive rhetoric. When I asked this question it was a sincere question that you may elucidate upon.
I try to communicate respect in all that I post. Unless someone decides to attack me personally I will continue to do so.
Your response seems defensive which I will infer is the reason why you chose not to answer the question specifically.
All the best.
thepbay wrote: Everything I do with a chart, is pretty much based on multiple moving averages and specific sequences. I'm not going to tell ppl how to trade. Spend time learning and understanding various indicators and MAs, and you will begin to see how to formulate support systems. I don't use any type of computer program because they don't take into effect all relevant info, ie. psychology around an event or somehting like that. It is years of practise and experience. I am not hiding anything when I make a post. If I like it, I say buy it. If it is too risky for the reward, I sell it. People can think all they want about what "agenda" I have. You will not find a post on all my history of me "bashing" a stock which I am looking to buy. If you think that, then you spend too much time on SH, and put way too much weight on what is said here. It means very little. People on this board are quick to run up and down an opposite view, rather than to look into what is being discussed. GL
pbay
1969Enigma wrote: Just to clarify... when you indicate that it tested .26 on the last run and in the past indicated it was going to test .22, can you put that into context? What are your upper and lower SP limit when you say testing a SP? Is it hitting the SP, or within a 2 or 3 cent variance? Please do not infer any sort of challenge in this question... I am asking for clarity so that in the future should you make such predictions.... it will make sense to me and perhaps others.
Cheers and GLTA.
thepbay wrote: Just call it like I see it, that is all. Way easier to talk on the board then answer all the email. Guess I must know what I am talking about. What I discussed long ago about fundamentals and business cycles has been proven. Take the chart out of it. If you think I am the one walking it down, ha. This board means jack sh*t. If I do buy again, I will make sure to inform you, if it makes you feel better. After all, I said when I bought and when I sold earlier. What more do you want? Go find the pump crew, that were always talking to Mackie, that pushed the BS all over this board. Don't see them here anymore. Experience in markets is what is missing on this board. Way too many newbies in this stock, drinking the Kool-Aid. Everyone is now hanging their hat on a NR from this Paris show. Not going to happen, and is something you should never do if you're "investing". That is called gambling. If there is any kind of chatter around a NR, the chart will tell you, just like it did when it was testing .26 on the last run. Till then, WAIT!!!!! GL
pbay