RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:From IRPips you can highlight passages that will allow us to read the things you want us to read but it's simply a fact that TO acknowledged the 90 days AND confirmed it was in Feb. I am a little perplexed as to why anyone would defend these idiots at this point. 2 months ago they gave governance that was false. The mis informed the share holders and now they are saying there has been a no guidance strategy "for a while now" . This is a sure flag of how mis managed this company is. Lots of ppl as saying that it's the complexity of the deal that is creating the hold up. It's obvious to me that if they are using the same rigour as we have seen in their communications and ownership towards the share holder, the problem are the managers not the complexity.