Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Highbank Resources Ltd V.HBK

Alternate Symbol(s):  HBKRF

Highbank Resources Ltd is engaged in the business of acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral resource properties in Canada. The company's project includes the Swamp Point North project.


TSXV:HBK - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by chester2on Sep 27, 2016 8:43pm
161 Views
Post# 25284067

Dawson Creek Mirror - How did they find out first? ITS a GO!

Dawson Creek Mirror - How did they find out first? ITS a GO!

 story-content=
/images.glaciermedia.ca/polopoly_fs/1.2352686!/fileImage/httpImage/image.png_gen/derivatives/original_size/fgsdgsdff.png" style="height: auto; max-width: 100%; vertical-align: middle; border: 0px; width: 1537.88px;">

The news comes at a time when the region's oilpatch, which would be the source of the gas, is struggling with high unemployment and surging employment insurance claims.

Kristi Leer, who runs a company that provides traffic control services in the oilpatch, said she was "jumping up and down for joy" after hearing the government green-lighted the project.

Leer lives in Fort Nelson, a community that's been among the hardest hit by the oil and gas downturn. Fort Nelson has lost nearly a fifth of its population during the latest downturn, according to estimates from the regional municipality.

An LNG export industry would stabilize the local economy, Leer said.

"It gives them something to start working towards," Leer said of what the decision means for unemployed people in her community. "Who would work on an LNG career if LNG isn't even possible for Canada? That alone will give a lot of people great hope."

Alan Yu, a campaigner with Fort St. John for LNG who programmed radios for the oilpatch before being laid off, said the government's "yes" gave him reason for hope.

"The reason I moved to Fort St. John a little over a year ago was because of LNG," he said. "My family is here, we decided to settle here. Without LNG, we might have to move out.”

At the same time, Tuesday's tentative "yes" does not guarantee the project will be built.

The Petronas-led consortium is expected to make a final investment decision sometime next year after reviewing the project. When upstream drilling investments are taken into account, Petronas plans to spend as much as $36 billion on Pacific NorthWest.

While the company says it's committed to its B.C. investments, there remains a glut of natural gas on the world market, which could make the project a money-loser—especially if environmental mitigation measures are stringent.

However, it will take at least four years to build the project, and the market for LNG could improve by the time it begins exporting in the 2020s.

Whether Pacific NorthWest LNG will make its decision before the next provincial election, set for May 2017, remains to be seen.

If the project does not move forward, Dawson Creek Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Kathleen Connolly said producers would have to find other outlets for B.C. gas.

"The devil really will be in the details and what those conditions look like," she said.

"If you've been paying attention to (Enbridge) buying pipe in the ground or TransCanada looking at buying a pipe from New York to Mexico, that tells me that they're not looking at the West Coast as a viable option in the next two to five years. They're going to push all that natural gas down to the Gulf."

It’s likely the project will see pushback from environmental and some First Nations groups.

The 812-member Lax Kw’alaams First Nations band initially opposed Pacific NorthWest LNG, but voted 65 per cent in favour of the project in late summer.

Some have occupied Lelu Island to pre

Bullboard Posts