RE:What Warren Irwin said about FissionThen why did Mr. Irwin invest 5 Million in Fission before the 600/840 land zones were even discovered? When the bulk of the mineralization at that time was under the lake???
giz62 wrote: When I look at what NexGen has over Fission, the biggest thing I see is it is just easier to mine. When I look at Fission and look at having to build dikes, I really do not like having to build dikes. They are quite a bit of work and actually the dike they need to build is quite big. Then from the bottom of the pit they need to go underground and then there is another issue surrounding what happens to radioactive dust, what happens to all the rainfall. It falls into the pit. There is a lot of water you have to purify and get the uranium out of that water before you could discharge it. You are dealing with you got a dike and you got Fission on the site of that dike. I just do not want to deal with all those hassles.
I think what will happen with Fission is overtime as they drill out their discovery the bells will ring and they will know exactly the best way to mine that. I do not think it will resemble the current mine plan they have. I think the deposit will tell the owners of Fission how to mine that. It may not involve dikes at all. It may involve simpler dikes or something. But I think there needs to be a better system to mine that and I think that will become clear to all investors overtime.