RE:RE:RE:LaticeInExileOne recent example of very questionable information posted by our friend Lattice was the allegation that there would eb an additional $72M finder's fee payable to Cinven, which was a complete short and distort fabrication.
ok2buy wrote: My reply was made in response to a post entitled "Strategic Review" - which stated "Conversation has significantly changed on that topic causing the write down and Brexit, but Mark alluded to something they are looking at which may happen in coming weeks. Any thoughts on what that may be?" LaticeInExile, as you pointed out, my reply was "Perhaps it will be his resignation". It is no secret that I have attended shareholder meetings and tried to take MT to task on the financials and recently his compensation package. While the stock was moving south, he bumped up his salary. I took exception to that, and still do. I stand by my comments. Hopefully you stand by all of yours and would be able to vigorously defend them. BTW, have you ever attended a shareholder meeting? By your own admission, you indicated that you have not encouraged posters to buy or sell the stock. But how many times have you posted questionable information? Want some examples? I can research past history too!/ok2