Money in confusion and misleading numbers?Yesterday's news release was a complete joke.
It made little to no sense, and different versions landed in different places.
The analysis by the FDA is to be done on the last 176 patients for primary 28 day mortality.
Where is this number in plain english?
The advertised 45% composite mortality rate was for the same 176 patient poulation.
Why was it left without that description in the presentation?
Corrections were made to the presentation ( .06 EAA to .6 in 2 places ) after the 45% was in question.
Why wasn't it clarified by the company in the presentation
Similar misleading errors were made on the PAID FOR Zacks report and NOT clarified either
I smell too much drama...see Josh posting a 1/2 dozen posts before 7am
Sqr