RE:MINESA....A Couple Anna Quotes....Schiff, when did this conversation take place and why are you only bringing these comments to our attention now?
The only posts you've referenced being in contact with Anna were as follows:
60-90 Days
Straight from Anna's lips to this bullboard....Arbitration would not come into play until 60-90 days after September 7th. They are purposely dragging their feet as my guess is they have a pretty clear picture of what's ahead and it does not include arbitration!
The first hurdle we have to get past is the October 2nd plebiscite in Colombia. Once the FARC deal is rubber stamped then Santos can finally release his plan of bringing the FARC members into the legal economy with LEGAL mining/security jobs......These jobs are going to come from a huge move into legal mining.....MINESA being one of the several big employers as they swallow-up EOM, GLW, CBJ, RD.
Funny that Brigitte in her op ed condemned many industries impacting the envrionment....Including ILLEGAL mining.....But yet mum's the word about LEGAL mining....She must have forgotten to mention LEGAL mining.....LOL! :)
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard#3o55oKILIsCmyv9f.99
RE:RE:60-90 Days
She indicated that it would take 60-90 days after September 7th to have things in order to move forward with arbitration.....I didn't buy it then.....I still don't buy it now.....Not that I blame her for saying it.....She has to toe-the-line.....And for the record I fully support Anna.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard#Vey0jXsdT3AJA6pm.99
If she truly made those comments, this is an extremely important and telling piece of information, paticularly in light of the upcoming vote. It clearly demonstrates that they're strategizing outside of the arbitration process and makes their intentions to dilute all the more dubious. I'm curious as to why you did not feel this worth mentioning back then, yet you're bringing it up now?
As I mentioned in many of my previous posts, we are most at risk under option A of this deal, if anything else happens other than an arbitration award. The entire deal ridiculously shady in my opinion, but if all that comes out of EOM is the arbitration award, the monetary impact to the disinterested sharehoolders is relatively the same (still garbage but the same). However, if any other settlement is reached or material event outside of an arbitration award the dillution is the last thing that we would want. Regardless of the garbage terms of option B, we would still get what is coming to us under those circumstances.
Either way, voting down option A is the obvious way to go. These recent quotes that you've posted just reinforce that the fix was in and why they are so adamant about promoting option A without disclosing the full details of option B.
BH