a questiom for bullmarketsfirst off, yes spitfire 4 did 700 bopd... so what are you referring to about 7000? of course there was a well in spitfire that did do 7000... do you know which one... perhaps it was spitfire 8?? the thing is, there was a well there that flowed 7000 bopd... so my question to you is,.... why are you talking as if there was an error... if someone mistaknely declared the well number as 4 but it was 7... why would you not correct it rather than leave it out there as if there was no 7000 bopd test? obviously it shows you have an agenda... You say it was an error in identiying the well but you don't bother to correct it but want to suggest maybe it never occured. When posters act like that, not simply correcting a well number butleaving it out there no such flow occured, when in fact it did occur just on another well...
For the record... well 5 flowed 1600 although I also find well 6 tested 1600 bopd... perhaps one is wrong... just what I read from some releases.
So yes a spitfie well flowed 7000 bopd... I am not sure which number it was....
this clown bullmarkets is obviously trying to talk this down... he simply could have corrected the well number and posted a well did indeed flow 7000 but NO... the clown has to simply say well 4 di not flow 7000.... not saying it was just anoher well that did indeed flow 7000
I am suspicious when a poster acts this way... it is so evident he is leaving thr impression a 7000 bopd flow never happenedand it was ONLY 700....
what a clown... my ignore list is growing fast.... so because this poster has shown he has a negative view, an agenda because he missed this great buy.... he is talkin it down... so I hate clowns that do this kind of junk....
ignore to bullmarkets....
bye bye sucker...LOL