Confusing numbers have binn a problem here...Take for example the original trial number..was it 360 or 306 or 360 "less 15% for
nutrition"?
Or the interim requirement was it 650 or 600 patients?
What about final number for the trial was it 446 or 450?
How about the actual number to be analyzed for 28 day mortality..was it 176, 180 or the French #243 ?
PS Pierre...the French numbers got a "little jumbled too"...contagin?
How about the 45% composite mortality, clearly on last 176/180, but "left naked" as a source of confusion
What about the 62M advertised as revenue from compassionate care revenue?
How bout the entire Zacks experience below...."What is going on"?
Did we pay ZACKs to make ELEMENTARY errors?
Did we get a discount from them?
In May 2015 we were valued at 155M...NOT 55M as reported.
The CDN and US dollar were significantly different
Why were some facts reported in US$ and some in CAD$?
Why did we TERMINATE the contract in January once we started to move upwards?
The story was to "wait for the news", the news came but NODODY was there to tell Americans.
Maybe the insiders are so confused they don't know whether to sell or not??
Hardly seems like a pump and dump...binn more like a $lump, JUMP and Cra$h
Who is taking the $ from the Cra$h portion of the program?
Anyone Bueller?
Sqr is disappointed but remains a "hanger on"
Stay tuned