RE:Steadyhands has an agenda My objective (not hidden) is to make money just like yours is. But I don't mislead people here. And I have given up - along with the rest of the investment community - on a takeover of any sorts. You were the one who brought up the RBC target only to distort it. The target is now $2.50 and Canacoords is now $1.34. Period. Do I give a rat's assss about their target - I do not. But I know that RBC has the most to LOSE here if the bonds go to zero - so I know that their target should be the most BULLISH of all the analysts. So just give it a rest already or you will sound like the former fundtrader or rougetrader who actually probably just turned people off this stock. The share price will end up where it should be, and whatever you say or I say on this bullboard doesn't matter. But I have a strong conviction when bulls get on this board and start touting a misleading "upside" price target. If the shorts started saying that RBC's price target was their "Downside" they would be assinated so lets just see how this week plays out.
juniorbullalive wrote: Why hammer away , with the stock down 90 %? - this guy and the other scum sucking , short selling clowns have an agenda - maybe to facilitate a cheap takeover ? Who knows ? And it amazes me they mention these analists targets like its gospel - these overpaid fools loved the stock at $100 - theyre all useless . The RBC guy has the best coverage but hes been told by the bosses to not make the bank look bad so give a wide range of possibilities $2.50 -$10 -typical of the Bad Street coverage .