Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by HighROIon Nov 24, 2016 9:17am
84 Views
Post# 25507362

RE:RE:Why update the PEA?

RE:RE:Why update the PEA?
What is mind boggling to me is why team pump thinks so highly of PLS yet all of team pump was for the DML / FCU merger?
 
If PLS is such a world class future mine why would you dilute PLS with DML's assets? 
 
Anyone that knows anything about mining in the basin knows that sinking shafts deeply in sandstone is extremely expensive and technically challenging and that any mining at the unconformity requires freezing. Both Denison's Gryphon and Phoenix are both under 100s of meters of sandstone and don't have the scale of McArthur River of Cigar Lake. Phoenix is also an unconformity deposit. 
 
Those including Dev who tout the shallowness of PLS where all about merging with Denison whose assets have much worse attributes than NXE's Arrow. 
 
 
The bulk of Nexgen's Arrow deposit sits between 400m and 600m. Arrow also has less than 100m of sandstone overlaying the basement rock. The majority of the resources is shallower than McArthur River and a similar depth to Cigar Lake. So 1) you are are mining in basement rock likely without the need for freezing and 2) you don't have to sink a shaft through 100s of meters of sandstone 3) the size of arrow will almost certainly be bigger than Cigar Lake and could potentially rival McArthur River. 

Anyone see the irony and hypocrisy of the PLS pumpers? 

 
Bullboard Posts