RE:RE:RE:Another snap shot of VRX vs CXRComparing 2 bad apples :) when you get -80 - 90% per year, it's not worth comparing... each has good and bad stuff, VRX has much more liability 31BLN debt, it's more bankrupt company, you need a monster company to save it, CRX has 3+ BLN debt, 10 times less debt.
Though VRX has better portfolio logically, but with smaller debt, company is more maneurable, not a titanic like VRX.
Looking at chart VRX behaved a little bit better, but same crapp... From 1 year chart, both are crapp, and as shorts pointing out both companies won't survive and it's high possibility, I agree with shorts, but I disagree in value of Concordia.
I believe UK business along with other International assets are worth a lot more than all current debt+stock are trading... Then there is US arm that is worth something too even now and with some proper management can be a good asset too...
Current debt is trading around 40-50c on a $1, so value of debt around $1.3-1.6 BLN + stock 150MLN
All liabilities without 350MLN, couldn't be more then 1.8BLN
UK business was acquired for $3.2 Bln, so it's worth at least 2BLN; then there is US business, that is worth 500MLN at least...
Total 2.5 BLN value compared to 1.8BLN in debt = we have 700 MLN that will be divided between bond and stock holders, most likely all wiil go to stock holders, because institution shareholders took haircut already and bond holders didn't, you can tell me that bondholders have priorities, it's true in bankruptcy, but companies where value is greater than current trading liabilities don't go to bankruptcy proceedings....
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=CXRX#symbol=CXRX;range=1y