RE:Has team europa ever told you a un - truth ?No doubt that an awful lot of posters jammed Mr.Perry alright Ilove.
This will get interesting. MyCash added this addition to the judgement you posted.
Hope you don' t mind .
189
These damages take into account the additional harm caused to the plaintiff's feelings by the defendant's outrageous and malicious conduct. Like general or special damages, they are compensatory in nature. Their assessment requires consideration by the jury of the entire conduct of the
defendant prior to the publication of the
libel and continuing through to the conclusion of the trial.
They represent the expression of natural indignation of right-thinking people arising from the malicious conduct of the defendant.
My comment- I' d bet a handful of loonies that "right - thinking" people will be individuals that do not trade stocks.
You can count on a smart Plaintiff Attorney stacking the jury that way if it went to trial.
ilovetojumpem1 wrote: All in the timing .
Hunter Dickinson Inc. v. Butler, 2010 BCSC 939 (CanLII) — 2010-03-30
Supreme Court of British Columbia — British Columbia
defamatory statements — punitive damages — published — website — reputation
[…] , b. on the Stockhouse.com internet website, any statement referring in any way to the Plaintiffs, whether by name, pseudonym, address, photograph or other means of identity […] a systematic, extensive and vicious campaign of libel…over an extraordinarily lengthy period ” with the express purpose and intent of embarrassing [the plaintiff mining company] and injuring its reputation. […] , a. on the Internet or by any other method or medium, any defamatory statement referring in any way to the Plaintiffs, whether by name, pseudonym, address, photograph or other means […]
cited by 2 cases
Black v. Breeden, 2010 ONCA 547 (CanLII) — 2010-08-13
Court of Appeal for Ontario — Ontario
forum — jurisdiction — substantial connection — libel — motion
[…] [61] The motion judge noted that it is indisputable that the law of libel in Ontario is more favourable toplaintiffs than that in the U.S. If Black were required […] [73] The defendants submit that the motion judge erred in failing toreferto jurisdictional restraint. […] They suggest that the focus of the analysis of where the tort of Internetlibel is committed should be on whether the defendant targeted the statements to the forum […]
cited by 9 cases
NOW THIS IS NASTY STUFF , EH > HA !
Several Canadian decisions referred to and relied upon the decision of York University v. Bell Canada Enterprises (2005), 2009 CanLII 46447 (ON SC), 99 O.R. (3d) 695 [York University] paras. 22 to 25 and ordered the Internet Service Provider to disclose the information requested.
The Judge in Busseri v. Doe, 2014 ONSC 819 (CanLII) made several scathing comments about anonymous bloggers.
“[20] There are few things more cowardly and insidious than an anonymous blogger who posts spiteful and defamatory comments about reputable member of the public and then hides behind the electronic curtain provided by the Internet. The Defendant confuses freedom of speech with freedom of defamation. There are, undoubtedly, legitimate anonymous Internet posts: persons critical of autocratic or repressive regimes, for example, or legitimate whistleblowers. The Defendant is not one of those people. The law will afford his posts all the protection that they deserve, which is to say none.”
See also Manson v. John Doe, 2013 ONSC 628 (CanLII)
And that folks is why you will not see cash man here a gain .
He ' s too close to the sitFUation .
What is going to happen could not WARRANT a nicer bunch .
Can any one say tort , libel , slander , financial compensation , character assassination ( sp HA ! )
Do i hear little gurls weepin ' for give me Mr . Perry ?